Abstract
The conservation status of the iconic giant panda is a barometer of global conservation efforts. The IUCN Red List has downgraded the panda’s extinction risk from “endangered” to “vulnerable”. Newly obtained, detailed GIS and remotely sensed data applied consistently over the last four decades show that panda habitat covered less area and was more fragmented in 2013 than in 1988 when the species was listed as endangered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Change institution
Buy or subscribe
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
£14.99 /30days
cancel any time
Learn more
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
£99.00 per year
only £8.25 per issue
Learn more
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
![Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing (1) Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing (1)](https://i0.wp.com/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41559-017-0317-1/MediaObjects/41559_2017_317_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing (2) Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing (2)](https://i0.wp.com/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41559-017-0317-1/MediaObjects/41559_2017_317_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
Sixty years of tracking conservation progress using the World Database on Protected Areas
Article 15 April 2019
Heather C. Bingham, Diego Juffe Bignoli, … Naomi Kingston
Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space
Article 13 May 2021
Andrew K. Skidmore, Nicholas C. Coops, … Vladimir Wingate
A global map of terrestrial habitat types
Article Open access 05 August 2020
Martin Jung, Prabhat Raj Dahal, … Piero Visconti
References
Swaisgood, R., Wang, D. & Weif, F. IUCN Redlist of Threatened Species: Ailuropoda melanoleuca (IUCN, 2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T712A45033386.en.
State Forestry Administration & WWF The 2nd National Survey Report on Giant Panda in China (1989).
State Forestry Administration The Third National Survey Report on the Giant Panda in China (Science Publishing House, Beijing, 2006).
Tang, X. et al. Forest Resour. Manage. 1, 11–16 (2015).
Liu, J. et al. Science 292, 98–101 (2001).
An, L. et al. Ecol. Econ. 42, 445–457 (2002).
Liu, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9477–9482 (2008).
Li, Y. et al. Land Use Policy 33, 42–53 (2013).
Ehrlich, P. R. et al. Nature 486, 68–73 (2012).
Liu, J. et al. Nature 421, 530–533 (2003).
Xu, W. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 353–358 (2009).
Sichuan Forestry Department Giant Pandas in Sichuan: Report of the Fourth Giant Panda Survey in Sichuan (Sichuan Science and Techology Press, Beijing, 2015).
Liu, W. et al. J. Sustain. Tour. 24, 203–226 (2016).
Hull, V. et al. J. Nat. Conserv. 22, 256–264 (2014).
Yang, B. et al. Conserv. Lett. 8, 251–261 (2015).
Report: Logging Hurts Panda Habitat (China Daily USA, 2015); http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-10/23/content_22262759.htm.
Tuanmu, M.-N. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 249–253 (2013).
Kong, L. et al. Biol. Conserv. 210, 83–88 (2017).
Li, B. V. & Pimm, S. L. Conserv. Biol. 30, 329–339 (2016).
Xu, W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1601–1606 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41671534), Ministry of Science and Technology through the National Key Programme of Research and Development Project (2016YFC0503200), State Forestry Administration, Worldwide Fund for Nature, and U.S. National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085, Beijing, China
Weihua Xu,Lingqiao Kong,Jingjing Zhang,Yi Xiao,Lu Zhang&Zhiyun Ouyang
Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823-5243, USA
Andrés Viña&Jianguo Liu
Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
Andrés Viña&Xiaodong Chen
University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
Lingqiao Kong&Jingjing Zhang
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
Stuart L. Pimm
College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, China
Wu Yang
Authors
- Weihua Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrés Viña
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lingqiao Kong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stuart L. Pimm
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jingjing Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yi Xiao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiaodong Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jianguo Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhiyun Ouyang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
W.X., A.V., S.L.P., J.L., and Z.O. designed research; W.X., A.V., L.K., J.Z., Y. X., and L.Z., performed research; W.X., L.K., J.Z., W.Y., and L.Z. analysed data; and W.X., A.V., S.L.P., W.Y., X.C., J.L., and Z.O. wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Stuart L. Pimm or Zhiyun Ouyang.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary data, tables, and references
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, W., Viña, A., Kong, L. et al. Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 1635–1638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0317-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0317-1
This article is cited by
-
Giant pandas in captivity undergo short-term adaptation in nerve-related pathways
- Yan Li
- Wei Xu
- Kailai Cai
BMC Zoology (2024)
-
Giant panda protection: urgent need for substantial action
- Dongwei Kang
- Junqing Li
Biodiversity and Conservation (2024)
-
The beneficial role of plant secondary compounds in giant panda foraging ecology
- Fei Yang
- Ronald R. Swaisgood
- Shibin Yuan
Mammalian Biology (2024)
-
Estimation of minimum viable population for giant panda ecosystems with membrane computing models
- Yingying Duan
- Haina Rong
- Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez
Natural Computing (2023)
-
Spatial models of giant pandas under current and future conditions reveal extinction risks
- Lingqiao Kong
- Weihua Xu
- Zhiyun Ouyang
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)